<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>D&#039;Arcy Norman dot net &#187; review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.darcynorman.net/tag/review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.darcynorman.net</link>
	<description>apparently much happier in person</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 03:52:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>1 year with a Kona Dew FS</title>
		<link>http://www.darcynorman.net/2008/09/11/1-year-with-a-kona-dew-fs/</link>
		<comments>http://www.darcynorman.net/2008/09/11/1-year-with-a-kona-dew-fs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 15:52:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dnorman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[fun]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bike]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.darcynorman.net/?p=2279</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve been meaning to write a mini review of my 2008 Kona Dew FS, and figured after riding it for a year I&#8217;d have some thoughts on how the bike works as a daily commuter. I picked the bike up exactly 1 year ago today, and have ridden it to and from work in pretty [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been meaning to write a mini review of my 2008 Kona Dew FS, and figured after riding it for a year I&#8217;d have some thoughts on how the bike works as a daily commuter. I picked the bike up exactly 1 year ago today, and have ridden it to and from work in pretty much all kinds of weather (+30˚C heat waves, monsoon thunder/hailstorms, blizzards, and -30˚C cold snaps). In that year, I&#8217;ve put 4,800km on the bike.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s the bike on the day after I bought it:</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a title="2000km by D'Arcy Norman, on Flickr" href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/dnorman/1362494975/"><img class="aligncenter" src="http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1206/1362494975_37c4e54686.jpg" alt="2000km" width="500" height="333" /></a></p>
<p>One thing I learned is that the bike shop makes a HUGE difference. I went into <a href="http://bowcycle.com/">Bow Cycle</a> thinking I wanted a particular bike &#8211; I&#8217;d done some research on teh intarwebs and all &#8211; and wound up talking to a tech/sales guy there. Doug asked me what I wanted to do with the bike, what my ride was like, etc&#8230; and wound up showing me a bike that was several hundred dollars cheaper than what I came in looking for. He walked me over to the <a href="http://konaworld.com/08_dewfs_c.htm">2008 Kona Dew FS</a>, which had apparently just come in, and we checked it out together. I took it for a quick spin, and bought it right there. I had the shop put on a rack so I could use my paniers, and fenders so I could ride in wet weather. I also had them switch out the seat for the one on my old bike &#8211; it&#8217;s a cheap seat, but I&#8217;ve gotten used to it. All in, I think the whole thing cost me $850 &#8211; and they gave me almost $50 for my crappy old bike as a trade-in.</p>
<p>What impressed me in the shop was the big-ass 700c tires. My previous bike (a 1994? Scott Head) was heavy, creaky, and the wheels were set up for mountain biking &#8211; big knobby tires on normal-sized wheels. The Kona has the giant 700c wheels, and comes with tires more suited to commuting (some grip, but much closer to street slicks than knobby mountain shredders). What does that mean for a commuter? Much less roll resistance. You can pedal, and the giant wheels will coast. And coast. And coast. Whereas the knobby mountain bike tires would bump-bump-bump and stop.</p>
<p>The tires are also rather thin &#8211; meaning there isn&#8217;t as much contacting the road surface, so there&#8217;s less friction to slow you down on an even surface. This turns out to be exactly what you want on a commuter bike for most of the year, but can be a pain when riding on snow and ice because you don&#8217;t have as much traction as you&#8217;d have with the fat knobby tires.</p>
<p>Another thing that impressed me right away was the range of gears. 3 gears in front, and 9 in back. For my ride, that&#8217;s exactly what I needed. I have to climb (and descend) a whole bunch of hills, so being able to drop down to a very low gear meant I was able to do the ride. And also being able to shift into a very high gear meant the downhill stretches were more fun <img src='http://www.darcynorman.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>And the index shifters are great, and make it easy to pop up or down a gear very quickly and efficiently. The only trouble I had with the shifters was a result of needing to tweak the adjustment &#8211; when I first got the bike, they were fine, but slowly I needed to really jam the left shifter to upshift. I wound up damaging my left thumb from pushing it too hard, too often. Stupid me, though, because it took a tech maybe a few seconds to adjust the shifter in the shop, and that problem went away. Lesson learned: regular maintenance is a good idea. Once adjusted, though, they&#8217;re rock solid. I can now shift and know the bike will respond. This makes crossing busy roads a bit less stressful, and also makes the long climb up the long hill on the way home just that much easier.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a title="kona on the rack by D'Arcy Norman, on Flickr" href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/dnorman/2277268501/"><img class="aligncenter" src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2308/2277268501_cd141e376b.jpg" alt="kona on the rack" width="500" height="375" /></a></p>
<p>The other thing that attracted me to the bike at first was the disk brakes. Again, my previous experience was with a crappy Sport Check Special bike, and its brakes weren&#8217;t very good. When wet, I&#8217;d blast through intersections because they didn&#8217;t have any stopping power. Not with the Kona. The disk brakes are fracking awesome. They can stop me when riding about 40km/h, in maybe 20 feet. I could probably stop faster if I tried. And they work great when wet. I don&#8217;t have to worry about losing stopping power. My bike will stop, assuming it&#8217;s got traction. One thing I found is that the disk brakes become slightly less effective in very cold temperatures. They still work &#8211; and much better than my previous pinch-brakes &#8211; but less effectively than when warm.</p>
<p>The &#8220;FS&#8221; in the bike&#8217;s model name stands for &#8220;Full Suspension&#8221; &#8211; it&#8217;s got a suspension front fork, and a suspension seat post. I love the front fork, because it&#8217;s also lockable. If you want a soft ride, or are going through some rough terrain (like construction zones, dirt paths, etc&#8230;) you open the fork so you have suspension on the front of the bike. But when you are on flat ground, and really want to give&#8217;r, you can lock it so it doesn&#8217;t suck energy out of you by bouncing up and down as you pedal. It really does make a huge difference, so when I&#8217;m riding up a hill I just reach down and flip the switch to Lock. Before I get to the construction zone near my house, I just flip it to Open, and I get all of the suspension goodness. Best of both worlds (except the weight of the suspension fork doesn&#8217;t go away when it&#8217;s in Lock&#8230;)</p>
<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 250px"><a title="open fork by D'Arcy Norman, on Flickr" href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/dnorman/2847814659/"><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3043/2847814659_780023d531_m.jpg" alt="open fork" width="240" height="135" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Open</p></div>
<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 250px"><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/dnorman/2847813899/"><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3214/2847813899_5d47d9b831_m.jpg" alt="locked fork" width="240" height="135" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Lock</p></div>
<p>The suspension seat post is a love/hate thing with me. I do like that it softens the ride. But, I&#8217;m really not a fan of the wobble it adds to the seat &#8211; it actually causes the seat to rotate slightly around the vertical axis as you move. It&#8217;s not the end of the world, but it can get annoying.</p>
<div class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 250px"><a title="basketless pedal by D'Arcy Norman, on Flickr" href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/dnorman/2847815625/"><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3103/2847815625_91c59238b7_m.jpg" alt="basketless pedal" width="240" height="135" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">no baskets here</p></div>
<p>What else&#8230; Oh! The bike comes with toe baskets on the pedals, so your feet are nice and stable while pedaling. I used these for the first few months, and was getting used to them. Starting and stopping at traffic lights was a bit interesting, as you have to slide your foot into the basket to get it into place, and you can&#8217;t always do that easily. When riding on slippery surfaces, I&#8217;d leave my feet out of the baskets, so the pedals were &#8220;upside down&#8221; when riding. That way, if I lost traction and started to go down, I could put my foot down more quickly, or swing it out for balance. That saved me from wiping out many times. But one afternoon, while riding through some deep snow, one of the baskets was ripped right off the pedal. I decided to remove the other one rather than replacing the broken basket, and found I liked riding the bike much better without the baskets at all. The pedals can be a little slippery, but the grips on my shoes (and in winter, boots) grips them well enough to keep my foot in place.</p>
<p>The only real &#8220;upgrade&#8221; I&#8217;ve done to the bike was to replace the rear tire. It wore out after about 2000km (because the rear of the bike carries most of the weight) and I replaced it with an Armadillo. Much better traction, and the tire seems to be relatively impervious to punctures &#8211; I&#8217;ve only had one flat with it since replacing the tire, and that was a torn valve stem not a puncture.</p>
<p>What I do know is that after 1 year, 4800km, 1 &#8220;dooring&#8221;, several wipe-outs, a few flats, a couple of <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/dnorman/sets/72157604478419319/">blizzards</a>, and daily rides of 14km each way, I still love the bike. I&#8217;d definitely recommend it to anyone looking for a good commuter bike. It&#8217;s not an offroad bike. But it&#8217;s one hell of a great commuter bike.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s the bike after a year of wear and tear (and it needs some love &#8211; I&#8217;ll give it a good scrub this weekend. promise!)</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a title="on the path by D'Arcy Norman, on Flickr" href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/dnorman/2847815961/"><img class="aligncenter" src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3090/2847815961_4a5489d137.jpg" alt="on the path" width="500" height="282" /></a></p>
 <img src="http://www.darcynorman.net/wp-content/plugins/feed-statistics.php?view=1&post_id=2279" width="1" height="1" style="display: none;" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.darcynorman.net/2008/09/11/1-year-with-a-kona-dew-fs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>38</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I give you KONG!</title>
		<link>http://www.darcynorman.net/2005/12/30/i-give-you-kong/</link>
		<comments>http://www.darcynorman.net/2005/12/30/i-give-you-kong/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dnorman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[kong]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">1931147772</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[	<div class='hreview x-wpsb-review-movie'>		<div>			<h3 class='item fn'><a class='url' href='http://www.kingkongmovie.com/'>King Kong (2005)</a></h3>			<p><div><img src="http://www.darcynorman.net/images/79m.jpg"/></div></p>			<p><a href='http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0360717/'>IMDB</a></p>			<p><b>Year</b>: 2005</p>			<p><b>Writer</b>: Fran Walsh, Phillipa Boyens</p>			<p><b>Director</b>: Peter Jackson</p>						<p><b>Length</b>: 183</p>			<p><b>Category</b>: Action</p>			<p><b>Media</b>: Film</p>																						<h4>Cast:</h4>									<li><b>Carl Denham</b>: Jack Black</li>									<li><b>Ann Darrow</b>: Naomi Watts</li>									<li><b>Jack Driscoll</b>: Adrien Brody</li>										</div>		<div><b>Rating</b>: <span class="rating">4</span> out of 5<div class="sb-fullstar"> </div><div class="sb-fullstar"> </div><div class="sb-fullstar"> </div><div class="sb-fullstar"> </div><div class="sb-emptystar"> </div><div style="clear: left"></div></div>		<div class='description'><p>This is neither the first, nor the best review of Kong. Check out <a href="http://binarybonsai.com/archives/2005/12/16/king-kong-review/">Michael's take on it</a> for a good read. These are just my thoughts on the movie...

I wanted to love this movie. I <em>really wanted</em> to <strong>love</strong> it. I'd heard from friends that Jack Black was corny in the role of Carl Denham. I'd heard the effects were amazing. I'd heard it was the spectacle movie event of the year. Basically, I'd heard stuff from all points of the spectrum. And I chose to suspend disbelief long enough to give the movie a decent chance.

So, I schlepped off to the theatre today, grabbed my 15L tub of Coke™, and my 2kg bag of popcorn. Foreshadowing: don't get the large Coke™ when heading into a three hour movie.

I sit down, best seat in the house - geometric centre of the theatre - and sit through the pre-movie ads and teasers. Then, the lights dim, and - hey! more ads! Great! I spend $10.95 for an afternoon matinee ticket, another $10.25 for a Coke™ and popcorn, and the theatre needs to show <strong>15 minutes of freaking ads</strong> before a <strong>three hour movie</strong> - because, I guess, we didn't pay enough to get in, and the movie wasn't quite long enough without assistance. Grr...

A mom sits a few rows behind me, with her 2 kids. Who are so small that they both need booster seats to see over the seat in front. I'm wondering (almost out lout) about what kinds of nightmares these kids should be having, because this is going to be some seriously messed up stuff, and I hope it would be too much for a 5 or 6 year old. If it's not too much for a kid that age, I'm really worried about what those kids are exposed to...

Movie starts, and I'm getting into it. Jack Black is actually pretty good as the slimy sleazeball producer. "You can trust me. I'm a movie producer." Sure, Jack. I keep wondering just how much of Carl Denham is Peter Jackson...

As the action builds, and they make their way to Skull Island ("it's not an adventure story, is it?"), I keep thinking that Weta might be recycling models from The Lord of The Rings, because a lot of Skull Island would look entirely at home in Mordor. Giant wall with gaping maw of a gate? And the texture/colour/shading of the rocks is extremely reminiscent of LoTR. Fine. Let it go. It's still pretty freaking impressive. The detail is absolutely stunning.

Really impressed with the "natives" of Skull Island. Scary as hell, with an air of mysticism - voodoo priestess with eyes rolled back in trance waiting for Kong to arrive, etc... Very cool stuff.

The machine that delivers <strike>Fae Ray</strike>Ann Darrow to Kong was pretty slick, too. Hmm... Who built this stuff? Not the natives... Not Kong... Maybe it was Dharma. Keep on the lookout for numeric strings etched into the walls... 4 8 15 16 23 42

OK. So Kong gets a boner for small blonde chicks. WTF? Sure, she's hot and all, but dude, she's 1% your size. It just won't work. There's physics involved. Oh, right, she makes you laugh. Clever, Peter. Clever.

Ooh. Dinosaurs. Of <strong>course</strong>! Cool. They're pretty well done, too. Apparently the dinosaurs of Skull Island aren't very physically able, as the panicked band of humans is able to outpace them with relative ease. I mean, these giants should be able to blast past the tiny hu-mans with ease. But they can't seem to get past them no matter how hard they try. Some impressive scenes with the thunder lizards, though. Wonder if there's going to be a PETA or SPCA approval notice at the end of the movie...

I'm not going to spoil any plot (ahem) elements or anything, but anyone who's seen the trailers will be aware that there is a battle scene between Kong and a bunch of scary dinosaurs (T.Rex?). It was a really great fight sequence, masterfully choreographed. But, I kept having flashbacks to Paul Hogan. "That's not a knife. <strong>That's</strong> a <em>knife</em>!"  Just as the fight started, out of nowhere a new dinosaur would stumble across it and join the fray. Sure, having a mouthful of a tonne of reptile meat is nice, but any intelligent T.Rex would gladly throw that away for a chance to have a part of Ann Darrow. There was a completely comic escalation of the fight sequence, from what could have been plausible (you know, in a world where giant apes and giant non-extinct dinosaurs live on the same island, and have insane lust for hot blondes) to a completely over-the-top (but still amazing) fight spectacular.

I kept picturing Peter Jackson in the storyboard meetings for this fight, saying stuff like "yeah, that's great. But what it needs is ANOTHER T. Rex, who is BIGGER than the other ones. That'll be even cooler! OH! And they should all fall down a cliff! OH! And they should swing around and - YEAH! AND KEEP FIGHTING! YEAH! That'll be SOO COOL! OH! OH! And Kong should pith a T.Rex WITH ITS OWN JAW! YEAH! THAT'S AWESOME!"

(several minutes of intense battle sequences - with me almost shouting out "Oh, come ON!", trapping, and magic teleportation back to New York)

Kong gives up. Chained and dressed up on stage. He's cool with that. Until they bring out the blonde hottie. Is it Ann? BOING! Nope. Just some bimbo. Must. Kill. Bimbo. Must. Kill. All. Bimbos. After the initial rampage, I think the composite IQ of New York City may have actually risen as a result of the Blonde Bimbo Cull of '32.

Then, Kong finds Ann. This is going to be... doh... 12L of Coke™ make it impossible to find out. I leave the theatre early, missing what I can only assume was a COOL! AMAZING! WAIT - HOW ABOUT IF HE JUMPS OFF OF THE EMPIRE STATE BUILDING AND SMACKS A BIPLANE! THAT'D BE SOOOO COOL!

Surprisingly, I didn't feel like I'd missed anything. I'd seen the effects - and they were absolutely incredible. I forgot that Kong was computer generated (or even occasionally that he was an ape at all). The story was not bad. The fight sequences were waaaay over the top.

<strong>Update</strong>: Almost forgot. One of the highlights of the movie was a trailer preview for Michael Mann's <a href="http://miamivice.com">Miami Vice movie</a>, with Jamie Foxx as Tubbs and Colin Farrell as Crocket. I'm a bit disappointed that <a href="http://imdb.com/title/tt0430357/?fr=c2l0ZT1kZnx0dD0xfGZiPXV8cG49MHxrdz0xfHE9bWlhbWkgdmljZXxmdD0xfG14PTIwfGxtPTUwMHxjbz0xfGh0bWw9MXxubT0x;fc=2;ft=22;fm=1">the IMDB entry for the movie</a> doesn't mention cameos by Don Johnson, Phillip Michael Thomas, or Edward James Olmos...</p></div>		<p><b>Tags</b>: movie review kong</p>	</div>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='hreview x-wpsb-review-movie'>
<div>
<h3 class='item fn'><a class='url' href='http://www.kingkongmovie.com/'>King Kong (2005)</a></h3>
<p>
<div><img src="http://www.darcynorman.net/images/79m.jpg"/></div>
</p>
<p><a href='http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0360717/'>IMDB</a></p>
<p><b>Year</b>: 2005</p>
<p><b>Writer</b>: Fran Walsh, Phillipa Boyens</p>
<p><b>Director</b>: Peter Jackson</p>
<p><b>Length</b>: 183</p>
<p><b>Category</b>: Action</p>
<p><b>Media</b>: Film</p>
<h4>Cast:</h4>
<li><b>Carl Denham</b>: Jack Black</li>
<li><b>Ann Darrow</b>: Naomi Watts</li>
<li><b>Jack Driscoll</b>: Adrien Brody</li></div>
<div><b>Rating</b>: <span class="rating">4</span> out of 5
<div class="sb-fullstar"> </div>
<div class="sb-fullstar"> </div>
<div class="sb-fullstar"> </div>
<div class="sb-fullstar"> </div>
<div class="sb-emptystar"> </div>
<div style="clear: left"></div>
</div>
<div class='description'>
<p>This is neither the first, nor the best review of Kong. Check out <a href="http://binarybonsai.com/archives/2005/12/16/king-kong-review/">Michael&#8217;s take on it</a> for a good read. These are just my thoughts on the movie&#8230;</p>
<p>I wanted to love this movie. I <em>really wanted</em> to <strong>love</strong> it. I&#8217;d heard from friends that Jack Black was corny in the role of Carl Denham. I&#8217;d heard the effects were amazing. I&#8217;d heard it was the spectacle movie event of the year. Basically, I&#8217;d heard stuff from all points of the spectrum. And I chose to suspend disbelief long enough to give the movie a decent chance.</p>
<p>So, I schlepped off to the theatre today, grabbed my 15L tub of Coke™, and my 2kg bag of popcorn. Foreshadowing: don&#8217;t get the large Coke™ when heading into a three hour movie.</p>
<p>I sit down, best seat in the house &#8211; geometric centre of the theatre &#8211; and sit through the pre-movie ads and teasers. Then, the lights dim, and &#8211; hey! more ads! Great! I spend $10.95 for an afternoon matinee ticket, another $10.25 for a Coke™ and popcorn, and the theatre needs to show <strong>15 minutes of freaking ads</strong> before a <strong>three hour movie</strong> &#8211; because, I guess, we didn&#8217;t pay enough to get in, and the movie wasn&#8217;t quite long enough without assistance. Grr&#8230;</p>
<p>A mom sits a few rows behind me, with her 2 kids. Who are so small that they both need booster seats to see over the seat in front. I&#8217;m wondering (almost out lout) about what kinds of nightmares these kids should be having, because this is going to be some seriously messed up stuff, and I hope it would be too much for a 5 or 6 year old. If it&#8217;s not too much for a kid that age, I&#8217;m really worried about what those kids are exposed to&#8230;</p>
<p>Movie starts, and I&#8217;m getting into it. Jack Black is actually pretty good as the slimy sleazeball producer. &#8220;You can trust me. I&#8217;m a movie producer.&#8221; Sure, Jack. I keep wondering just how much of Carl Denham is Peter Jackson&#8230;</p>
<p>As the action builds, and they make their way to Skull Island (&#8221;it&#8217;s not an adventure story, is it?&#8221;), I keep thinking that Weta might be recycling models from The Lord of The Rings, because a lot of Skull Island would look entirely at home in Mordor. Giant wall with gaping maw of a gate? And the texture/colour/shading of the rocks is extremely reminiscent of LoTR. Fine. Let it go. It&#8217;s still pretty freaking impressive. The detail is absolutely stunning.</p>
<p>Really impressed with the &#8220;natives&#8221; of Skull Island. Scary as hell, with an air of mysticism &#8211; voodoo priestess with eyes rolled back in trance waiting for Kong to arrive, etc&#8230; Very cool stuff.</p>
<p>The machine that delivers <strike>Fae Ray</strike>Ann Darrow to Kong was pretty slick, too. Hmm&#8230; Who built this stuff? Not the natives&#8230; Not Kong&#8230; Maybe it was Dharma. Keep on the lookout for numeric strings etched into the walls&#8230; 4 8 15 16 23 42</p>
<p>OK. So Kong gets a boner for small blonde chicks. WTF? Sure, she&#8217;s hot and all, but dude, she&#8217;s 1% your size. It just won&#8217;t work. There&#8217;s physics involved. Oh, right, she makes you laugh. Clever, Peter. Clever.</p>
<p>Ooh. Dinosaurs. Of <strong>course</strong>! Cool. They&#8217;re pretty well done, too. Apparently the dinosaurs of Skull Island aren&#8217;t very physically able, as the panicked band of humans is able to outpace them with relative ease. I mean, these giants should be able to blast past the tiny hu-mans with ease. But they can&#8217;t seem to get past them no matter how hard they try. Some impressive scenes with the thunder lizards, though. Wonder if there&#8217;s going to be a PETA or SPCA approval notice at the end of the movie&#8230;</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not going to spoil any plot (ahem) elements or anything, but anyone who&#8217;s seen the trailers will be aware that there is a battle scene between Kong and a bunch of scary dinosaurs (T.Rex?). It was a really great fight sequence, masterfully choreographed. But, I kept having flashbacks to Paul Hogan. &#8220;That&#8217;s not a knife. <strong>That&#8217;s</strong> a <em>knife</em>!&#8221;  Just as the fight started, out of nowhere a new dinosaur would stumble across it and join the fray. Sure, having a mouthful of a tonne of reptile meat is nice, but any intelligent T.Rex would gladly throw that away for a chance to have a part of Ann Darrow. There was a completely comic escalation of the fight sequence, from what could have been plausible (you know, in a world where giant apes and giant non-extinct dinosaurs live on the same island, and have insane lust for hot blondes) to a completely over-the-top (but still amazing) fight spectacular.</p>
<p>I kept picturing Peter Jackson in the storyboard meetings for this fight, saying stuff like &#8220;yeah, that&#8217;s great. But what it needs is ANOTHER T. Rex, who is BIGGER than the other ones. That&#8217;ll be even cooler! OH! And they should all fall down a cliff! OH! And they should swing around and &#8211; YEAH! AND KEEP FIGHTING! YEAH! That&#8217;ll be SOO COOL! OH! OH! And Kong should pith a T.Rex WITH ITS OWN JAW! YEAH! THAT&#8217;S AWESOME!&#8221;</p>
<p>(several minutes of intense battle sequences &#8211; with me almost shouting out &#8220;Oh, come ON!&#8221;, trapping, and magic teleportation back to New York)</p>
<p>Kong gives up. Chained and dressed up on stage. He&#8217;s cool with that. Until they bring out the blonde hottie. Is it Ann? BOING! Nope. Just some bimbo. Must. Kill. Bimbo. Must. Kill. All. Bimbos. After the initial rampage, I think the composite IQ of New York City may have actually risen as a result of the Blonde Bimbo Cull of &#8216;32.</p>
<p>Then, Kong finds Ann. This is going to be&#8230; doh&#8230; 12L of Coke™ make it impossible to find out. I leave the theatre early, missing what I can only assume was a COOL! AMAZING! WAIT &#8211; HOW ABOUT IF HE JUMPS OFF OF THE EMPIRE STATE BUILDING AND SMACKS A BIPLANE! THAT&#8217;D BE SOOOO COOL!</p>
<p>Surprisingly, I didn&#8217;t feel like I&#8217;d missed anything. I&#8217;d seen the effects &#8211; and they were absolutely incredible. I forgot that Kong was computer generated (or even occasionally that he was an ape at all). The story was not bad. The fight sequences were waaaay over the top.</p>
<p><strong>Update</strong>: Almost forgot. One of the highlights of the movie was a trailer preview for Michael Mann&#8217;s <a href="http://miamivice.com">Miami Vice movie</a>, with Jamie Foxx as Tubbs and Colin Farrell as Crocket. I&#8217;m a bit disappointed that <a href="http://imdb.com/title/tt0430357/?fr=c2l0ZT1kZnx0dD0xfGZiPXV8cG49MHxrdz0xfHE9bWlhbWkgdmljZXxmdD0xfG14PTIwfGxtPTUwMHxjbz0xfGh0bWw9MXxubT0x;fc=2;ft=22;fm=1">the IMDB entry for the movie</a> doesn&#8217;t mention cameos by Don Johnson, Phillip Michael Thomas, or Edward James Olmos&#8230;</p>
</div>
<p><b>Tags</b>: movie review kong</p>
</p></div>
<p><script type="application/x-subnode; charset=utf-8">
       <!-- the following is structured blog data for machine readers. -->
       <subnode xmlns:data-view="http://www.w3.org/2003/g/data-view#" data-view:transformation="http://structuredblogging.org/subnode-to-rdf-interpreter.xsl" xmlns="http://www.structuredblogging.org/xmlns#subnode">
       	    <xml-structured-blog-entry xmlns="http://www.structuredblogging.org/xmlns">
       		    <generator id="wpsb-1" type="x-wpsb-post" version="1"/><review type="review/movie"><subject name="King Kong (2005)" year="2005" length="183" category="action" media="film" url="http://www.kingkongmovie.com/" imdburl="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0360717/" writer="Fran Walsh, Phillipa Boyens" director="Peter Jackson" image="http://www.darcynorman.net/images/79m.jpg"><upc media="dvd"/><cast character="Carl Denham">Jack Black</cast><cast character="Ann Darrow">Naomi Watts</cast><cast character="Jack Driscoll">Adrien Brody</cast></subject><rating max="5" min="0">4</rating><description>This is neither the first, nor the best review of Kong. Check out &lt;a href=&quot;http://binarybonsai.com/archives/2005/12/16/king-kong-review/&quot;&gt;Michael's take on it&lt;/a&gt; for a good read. These are just my thoughts on the movie...</p>
<p>I wanted to love this movie. I &lt;em&gt;really wanted&lt;/em&gt; to &lt;strong&gt;love&lt;/strong&gt; it. I'd heard from friends that Jack Black was corny in the role of Carl Denham. I'd heard the effects were amazing. I'd heard it was the spectacle movie event of the year. Basically, I'd heard stuff from all points of the spectrum. And I chose to suspend disbelief long enough to give the movie a decent chance.</p>
<p>So, I schlepped off to the theatre today, grabbed my 15L tub of Coke™, and my 2kg bag of popcorn. Foreshadowing: don't get the large Coke™ when heading into a three hour movie.</p>
<p>I sit down, best seat in the house - geometric centre of the theatre - and sit through the pre-movie ads and teasers. Then, the lights dim, and - hey! more ads! Great! I spend $10.95 for an afternoon matinee ticket, another $10.25 for a Coke™ and popcorn, and the theatre needs to show &lt;strong&gt;15 minutes of freaking ads&lt;/strong&gt; before a &lt;strong&gt;three hour movie&lt;/strong&gt; - because, I guess, we didn't pay enough to get in, and the movie wasn't quite long enough without assistance. Grr...</p>
<p>A mom sits a few rows behind me, with her 2 kids. Who are so small that they both need booster seats to see over the seat in front. I'm wondering (almost out lout) about what kinds of nightmares these kids should be having, because this is going to be some seriously messed up stuff, and I hope it would be too much for a 5 or 6 year old. If it's not too much for a kid that age, I'm really worried about what those kids are exposed to...</p>
<p>Movie starts, and I'm getting into it. Jack Black is actually pretty good as the slimy sleazeball producer. &quot;You can trust me. I'm a movie producer.&quot; Sure, Jack. I keep wondering just how much of Carl Denham is Peter Jackson...</p>
<p>As the action builds, and they make their way to Skull Island (&quot;it's not an adventure story, is it?&quot;), I keep thinking that Weta might be recycling models from The Lord of The Rings, because a lot of Skull Island would look entirely at home in Mordor. Giant wall with gaping maw of a gate? And the texture/colour/shading of the rocks is extremely reminiscent of LoTR. Fine. Let it go. It's still pretty freaking impressive. The detail is absolutely stunning.</p>
<p>Really impressed with the &quot;natives&quot; of Skull Island. Scary as hell, with an air of mysticism - voodoo priestess with eyes rolled back in trance waiting for Kong to arrive, etc... Very cool stuff.</p>
<p>The machine that delivers &lt;strike&gt;Fae Ray&lt;/strike&gt;Ann Darrow to Kong was pretty slick, too. Hmm... Who built this stuff? Not the natives... Not Kong... Maybe it was Dharma. Keep on the lookout for numeric strings etched into the walls... 4 8 15 16 23 42</p>
<p>OK. So Kong gets a boner for small blonde chicks. WTF? Sure, she's hot and all, but dude, she's 1% your size. It just won't work. There's physics involved. Oh, right, she makes you laugh. Clever, Peter. Clever.</p>
<p>Ooh. Dinosaurs. Of &lt;strong&gt;course&lt;/strong&gt;! Cool. They're pretty well done, too. Apparently the dinosaurs of Skull Island aren't very physically able, as the panicked band of humans is able to outpace them with relative ease. I mean, these giants should be able to blast past the tiny hu-mans with ease. But they can't seem to get past them no matter how hard they try. Some impressive scenes with the thunder lizards, though. Wonder if there's going to be a PETA or SPCA approval notice at the end of the movie...</p>
<p>I'm not going to spoil any plot (ahem) elements or anything, but anyone who's seen the trailers will be aware that there is a battle scene between Kong and a bunch of scary dinosaurs (T.Rex?). It was a really great fight sequence, masterfully choreographed. But, I kept having flashbacks to Paul Hogan. &quot;That's not a knife. &lt;strong&gt;That's&lt;/strong&gt; a &lt;em&gt;knife&lt;/em&gt;!&quot;  Just as the fight started, out of nowhere a new dinosaur would stumble across it and join the fray. Sure, having a mouthful of a tonne of reptile meat is nice, but any intelligent T.Rex would gladly throw that away for a chance to have a part of Ann Darrow. There was a completely comic escalation of the fight sequence, from what could have been plausible (you know, in a world where giant apes and giant non-extinct dinosaurs live on the same island, and have insane lust for hot blondes) to a completely over-the-top (but still amazing) fight spectacular.</p>
<p>I kept picturing Peter Jackson in the storyboard meetings for this fight, saying stuff like &quot;yeah, that's great. But what it needs is ANOTHER T. Rex, who is BIGGER than the other ones. That'll be even cooler! OH! And they should all fall down a cliff! OH! And they should swing around and - YEAH! AND KEEP FIGHTING! YEAH! That'll be SOO COOL! OH! OH! And Kong should pith a T.Rex WITH ITS OWN JAW! YEAH! THAT'S AWESOME!&quot;</p>
<p>(several minutes of intense battle sequences - with me almost shouting out &quot;Oh, come ON!&quot;, trapping, and magic teleportation back to New York)</p>
<p>Kong gives up. Chained and dressed up on stage. He's cool with that. Until they bring out the blonde hottie. Is it Ann? BOING! Nope. Just some bimbo. Must. Kill. Bimbo. Must. Kill. All. Bimbos. After the initial rampage, I think the composite IQ of New York City may have actually risen as a result of the Blonde Bimbo Cull of '32.</p>
<p>Then, Kong finds Ann. This is going to be... doh... 12L of Coke™ make it impossible to find out. I leave the theatre early, missing what I can only assume was a COOL! AMAZING! WAIT - HOW ABOUT IF HE JUMPS OFF OF THE EMPIRE STATE BUILDING AND SMACKS A BIPLANE! THAT'D BE SOOOO COOL!</p>
<p>Surprisingly, I didn't feel like I'd missed anything. I'd seen the effects - and they were absolutely incredible. I forgot that Kong was computer generated (or even occasionally that he was an ape at all). The story was not bad. The fight sequences were waaaay over the top.</p>
<p>&lt;strong&gt;Update&lt;/strong&gt;: Almost forgot. One of the highlights of the movie was a trailer preview for Michael Mann's &lt;a href=&quot;http://miamivice.com&quot;&gt;Miami Vice movie&lt;/a&gt;, with Jamie Foxx as Tubbs and Colin Farrell as Crocket. I'm a bit disappointed that &lt;a href=&quot;http://imdb.com/title/tt0430357/?fr=c2l0ZT1kZnx0dD0xfGZiPXV8cG49MHxrdz0xfHE9bWlhbWkgdmljZXxmdD0xfG14PTIwfGxtPTUwMHxjbz0xfGh0bWw9MXxubT0x;fc=2;ft=22;fm=1&quot;&gt;the IMDB entry for the movie&lt;/a&gt; doesn't mention cameos by Don Johnson, Phillip Michael Thomas, or Edward James Olmos...</description><tags>movie review kong</tags></review>
       	    </xml-structured-blog-entry>
       </subnode>
       </script></p>
 <img src="http://www.darcynorman.net/wp-content/plugins/feed-statistics.php?view=1&post_id=966" width="1" height="1" style="display: none;" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.darcynorman.net/2005/12/30/i-give-you-kong/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
