ragingly ambivalent. or something. whatever.
Posts tagged as:
With my recent thinking about openness, I’ve found myself starting to channel an internal devil’s advocate voice… This post does not represent my personal beliefs, but if we’re going to talk about open education, we need to explore all sides of it…
Is truly open education a desirable goal? Is the eradication of all barriers to [...]
{ 7 comments }
Some off the cuff (on the bike) rambling about some thoughts about what open education is – open content, open access and open accreditation. This is hopefully rock bottom with respect to video production quality – but at least you get to come along for some of my ride home…
{ 16 comments }
A follow-up on my last rant on openness in universities, wherin I improperly aim the camera and showcase my multitude of chin-related tissue.
{ 4 comments }
I stopped to record a quick stream-of-thought rant about openness and the institution. My opinions are my own, not my employers, etc… Please don’t fire me.
And, yes, I know that I said “thousands of years” – I meant “hundreds…” or “a long time”. Whatever.
{ 2 comments }
I’m not going to write up a summary or wrap-up of the conference. Others have done that better, and faster, than I. But I do just want to throw some thoughts out there on my Open Ed experience.
First, it was an amazing conference. There aren’t many events that bring together such a vastly diverse group [...]
{ 7 comments }
David suggested in his opening comments yesterday that “content is infrastructure.” He was (I think) meaning to imply that content is an enabling platform, and that if a robust library of open content is available, that individuals and groups will be able to build new things from that library. Things that can’t be predicted by [...]
{ 2 comments }
