rate this

January 12, 2010 · 0 comments

in general

I’m trying the rating features baked into the latest version of the PollDaddy plugin. It looks pretty cool – you can set it to allow rating of posts, pages, and even comments. Not sure how it’ll be used, or if it will be useful at all, but there it is. Rate away. If you have nothing better to do…

{ 0 comments }

Given that the U of A is switching to Google for email, it would seem the primary argument for hosting stuff on campus may no longer be critical – if it’s OK to host content and student info from a Canadian university on an American server.

So, the question becomes: Should campuses host their own services? Email? Blogs? Wikis? Would it be better to just point people to recommended third party services (wordpress.com, etc…) and provide some support and context?

Should I still be running UCalgaryBlogs.ca and wiki.ucalgary.ca? Should they be transitioned to off-campus services?

I really need to hear from faculty, students, staff, and the off-campus community. Any opinions?

{ 41 comments }

A great manifesto. 43 guiding principles to live by. (via David Gillespie)

My faves:

6. capture accidents
12. keep moving
13. slow down
14. don’t be cool
20. be careful to take risks
32. listen carefully
33. take field trips
38. explore the other edge (everyone crowds the leading edge…)

{ 0 comments }

interesting

January 11, 2010 · 0 comments

in general

Stuff from this morning’s romp through my RSS reader:

{ 0 comments }

Thought of the day:

Technology doesn’t make learning any more relevant or effective. Good teaching does that. Treating everyone in the class as fully fledged human beings does that. Respecting the contributions, backgrounds, and interests of all learners does that. Relevant and effective teaching and learning can occur without any technology at all, if given a creative enough environment in which to work. Technology may help to extend and enhance, but there are critical pieces that need to be in place before any technology will make a difference.

{ 12 comments }

Here’s some of the things I’ve Saved in my RSS reader over the last few days. If you have a few minutes to kill, these links should fit the bill.

  • The Online Photographer – A Gift Waiting at Every Corner: Notes from a Life in Photography
    A great article about a career photographer’s life, and how they approach photography.

    I have embraced photojournalism as a means to communicate, provoke, and inspire, as well as to document history. I have employed the camera as a voice with which I can shout out about injustice while affirming what is beautiful and good. My body and soul have been exposed to many dimensions of the human condition, from its most glorious to its most wretched.

  • A Basic Introduction to Singularity Skepticism
    An article linked to by Brian Lamb in del.icio.us. A great overview of singularity hype/counterhype, and how to lie with selective data in graphs.
  • How to open your mind? (via David Gillespie)

    Aside from drugs and sex what activities would you recommend for a girl in her twenties with an interest in mind-expansion?
    Get a passport. Use it as often as possible. Read. Books, that is. Ones without pictures. Surround yourself with brilliant and fascinating people. Say yes whenever you can, except to religion and authority. Create things. Fall in and out of love. Never forget that you will die one day.

  • Someone’s stalled again.
    Brian Lamb’s thoughts on the depressing state of government and national pride in Canada.
  • xkcd: mourning a server admin
  • Bruce Schneier on newsworthiness and fear (via Marco Arment)

    I tell people that if it’s in the news, don’t worry about it. The very definition of ‘news’ is ‘something that hardly ever happens.’ It’s when something isn’t in the news, when it’s so common that it’s no longer news — car crashes, domestic violence — that you should start worrying.
    — Bruce Schneier (via charliepark)

  • Our true north strong and free. Canada is awesome. Via BoingBoing.

    Last month, homeless people started showing up in droves in towns 100 miles or so outside of Vancouver. They had been given one-way bus tickets and were forced onto the busses. Local shelters in those communities have been completely overloaded. All so that the world can see a shiny and clean (and totally false) version of our city.

  • The mayor of New York City on September 11, 2001 seems to have forgotten something. via BoingBoing

    We have had no domestic attacks under Bush; we’ve had one under Obama.
    - Rudy Giuliani

  • FlickrBlog points to some awesome photos taken in Korea after WWII
  • How to enjoy winter biking. Because it’s awesome, when it’s not -30˚C and buried under a couple feet of snow.

{ 2 comments }

2009/365photos

January 1, 2010 · 1 comment

in photography

2009/365photos from D'Arcy Norman on Vimeo.

direct link to the video, for RSSites.

{ 1 comment }

I’ve been trying to pick one photo taken in 2009 to be the “photo of the year” but can’t seem to do it. I’ve narrowed it down to 4 photos. So, here are the 4 2009 photos of the year:



one way – February 10 – while riding my bike over an overpass on the way to visit the dentist, I noticed the symmetry of lines just as a snow squall hit.



longview – June 27 – Taken during day 1 of the 2009 Ride to Conquer Cancer, at the last rest stop of the day before reaching camp. The sky in southwestern Alberta is astounding, contrasted with the lush green grassland.



start of day – November 5 – taken along the 32nd avenue entrance to the northeast corner of the University of Calgary campus, showing the activity of morning commuters, and the construction site for the EEEL building.



dalhousie station – a cold and wet c-train platform.


It was a fun year in pictures. I did the 365photos project again, joined the @dailyshoot project, got published in a photobook of local Calgary photographers, and had a bunch of photos published. Fun stuff.

I’m really happy with how 74 photos turned out – here’s my 2009 5 stars gallery – and am really glad I’m learning so much about photography (both technical and philosophical) and still having a blast doing it.

{ 8 comments }

on Avatar

December 27, 2009 · 17 comments

in general

I finally saw Avatar, and left the theatre with lots of conflicting reactions to the movie.

  • cinematically gorgeous
  • amazing visuals
  • fascinating biology
  • but… why are the Na’vi simply caricatures of humans?
  • but… in a fully 3D-modeled-and-rendered world, why are the Na’vi so human?
  • why is Cameron so heavy handed in his Gaia-theory stuff?
  • this is largely just a mashup of every Cameron movie I’ve ever seen, right down to characters and gadgets.
  • what would this movie have been like had Cameron really let go of terrestrial biology, psychology, and sociology?

My first reaction, one that hit me strongly when the Na’vi first appear on screen, was: “A rasta jar jar binks would not seem out of place in this movie.”

My second reaction was to the colonial nature of the story. Big, bad, evil, greedy, corporate (white) humans travel to a new world and try to take it over. This is so much better described by Annalee Newitz. I was disappointed to not have a real story of The Other – rather just a glimpse of a (strongly humanoid) Other only insofar as it benefits or impacts Humans.

My third reaction was to the familiarity of the story threads. “Aliens 2: Na’vi in the Mist: Braveheart’s Revenge.” Carter Burke was there in full force. I’m guessing Paul Reiser was unavailable for filming Avatar, but the character was there in complete detail as reprised by Giovanni Ribisi. The robotic exoskeleton UFC championship match was replayed from the closing of Aliens. Sigourney Weaver brought back Ripley, as reimagined through the eyes of Dian Fossey. Everything in this movie felt familiar. And this completely deflated any sense of alienness or truly otherworldness.

As someone who spent a few years as an undergrad studying zoology, I had really high hopes. Here, we had an alien world, completely invented by Cameron. A world that was modeled and rendered inside a computer, free of terrestrial constraints and preconceptions.

Life on Pandora could have been truly different. Instead, it was compatible with terrestrial life – right down to the DNA. We have upright bipedal humanoids. Sure, they’re bigger (due to lower gravity on Pandora – see? they were paying attention to what life could be like off Earth), but they really just look like big humans in blue body paint. Why did the Na’vi even need arms and legs? What would life be like if they were vermiform? If they had no skeletal system? What if they were truly different, didn’t have DNA, and were not readily understandable? What if they didn’t eat? If they were able to generate energy directly from their environment? Instead, we have “aliens” with biological systems very much like our own. Where we were able to build colonial schools to teach the primitive natives to speak english so that we could improve them and rescue them from their indigenous existence.

The one notable exception is the ethernet jack woven into their dreadlocks.

Even alien sex is compatible with the human notion of it. We have a race of people who are able to directly connect with each other through the dreadnet jack, and yet their “mating for life” is making the beast with two backs. Sure, that makes for more identifiable actions on screen, and perhaps draws the audience in a bit more, but even this could have been Different.

Avatar was frustrating to me because Cameron and his team showed that they could think about biology with a bit of a fresh slate – or at least one drawn from non-terrestrial-land-based lifeforms. Many of the species shown in the Pandora forest were based on terrestrial deep sea aquatic forms. The filter feeders on the floor of the forest were fantastic. When I first saw Jakesully stumble into the field of fans, I thought “oh! those look like filter feeding tube worms. I wonder what would happen if he touched one of the tendrils…” And then Jakesully touched one, and PLIFF it retracted just as a tube worm’s fan would. Very cool. Not what you’d expect to see in a terrestrial forest. And yet still somewhat familiar.

The little lizard-like critters that could fly using what appeared to be a form of da Vinci’s Helicopter were interesting. Not sure that’d be physically possible, but still interesting. And different. Yet still familiar. Lizards. da Vinci’s Helicopter.

The seed pods from the Tree of Life were also fascinating – fluid air-borne jellyfish. These were probably the most unique organisms shown in the movie. And, still these were familiar. Jellyfish.

The official Pandorapedia has entries for a few species, but I would love to see info about the other organisms that make up the world of Pandora.

And… unobtanium? really?

I can only hope that the sequel doesn’t involve some kind of lame Star Trek notion of a universal genome, salted by a grandfather species billions of years ago. Avatar had the potential to be a game changing story of an alien world. Instead, we got a rehash of White Guilt, told through bits of every major motion picture ever made. I hope there are some follow-up documentaries, exploring the species of Pandora without the lens of human superiority and domination.

{ 17 comments }

I’d actually held some hope for meaningful change brought about by the discussions in Copenhagen this month. But everything I’m seeing and reading lately sounds like it’s pretty much just political greenwashing and crushed peaceful protests.

Elizabeth May has been blogging from Copenhagen (see comments by Hugo Chavez – who would have put him in the role of speaker-of-truth? – and Prime Minister Zenawi of Ethiopia – a country that has committed to carbon neutrality by 2025, not just a slight de-escalation to 2006 levels). Things don’t sound good. Non-G8 nations are super-pissed about the lack of transparency, and about the non-democratic nature of the whole process. And they have every right to be super-pissed. We all do.

Canada’s contribution is pretty impressive. The Calgary morning papers are blaring in large type that we’re going to be OK – there will likely be concessions to allow the Alberta Tar Sands to continue relatively unchecked. Whew. Thank Xenu, we won’t have to slow development of the single dirtiest source of atmospheric carbon on the planet. That’s the kind of change we can hope for here in Canada. Screw the rest of the planet, we need our oil! Actually, screw Canada, too, because much of the north half of the country is about to melt. But that’s OK. There aren’t many white people up there, so it’s an acceptable loss. Or something.

Kris Krug is there covering the talks with Press credentials. His photos are incredible, frustrating, and scary. I hope there is more going on than back door deals, but I fear that’s all we’re going to get.

And this cellphone video of the stellar treatment of peaceful protestors. Batons ready!

It’s not like this is the first time peaceful protests have been squashed, either.

{ 6 comments }