<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: my final post on edupunk</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.darcynorman.net/2008/06/18/my-final-post-on-edupunk/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.darcynorman.net/2008/06/18/my-final-post-on-edupunk/</link>
	<description>just a lowly edtech geek, mumble mumble university of calgary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 17:18:11 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Andy Best</title>
		<link>http://www.darcynorman.net/2008/06/18/my-final-post-on-edupunk/#comment-183818</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Best</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 09:46:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.darcynorman.net/?p=1976#comment-183818</guid>
		<description>I think punk was and is the right term. Most models of education around the globe are oppressive systems of normalisation - especially from elementary through high school. Also, &#039;web 2.0&#039; is not being used enough in a progressive way, especially considering it&#039;s potential.

Basic ideas that are normal to us, like student centred education and learning through process not evaluation are revolutionary in this context - hence the reaction once you label it punk. These ideas have often been called &#039;progressive&#039; and sometimes &#039;revolutionary&#039; but it&#039;s not until Jim called it Punk that a few peeps got shook up - which is good.

Language and meaning is under constant attack from politicians and mainstream media spin - if you find the word that makes people examine our systems in education critically for a change - stick with it - as long as you can.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think punk was and is the right term. Most models of education around the globe are oppressive systems of normalisation &#8211; especially from elementary through high school. Also, &#8216;web 2.0&#8242; is not being used enough in a progressive way, especially considering it&#8217;s potential.</p>
<p>Basic ideas that are normal to us, like student centred education and learning through process not evaluation are revolutionary in this context &#8211; hence the reaction once you label it punk. These ideas have often been called &#8216;progressive&#8217; and sometimes &#8216;revolutionary&#8217; but it&#8217;s not until Jim called it Punk that a few peeps got shook up &#8211; which is good.</p>
<p>Language and meaning is under constant attack from politicians and mainstream media spin &#8211; if you find the word that makes people examine our systems in education critically for a change &#8211; stick with it &#8211; as long as you can.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Wall</title>
		<link>http://www.darcynorman.net/2008/06/18/my-final-post-on-edupunk/#comment-183676</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Wall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 16:40:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.darcynorman.net/?p=1976#comment-183676</guid>
		<description>@Scott Ain&#039;t that the truth. A few people, and I may have been among them, were taking the edupunk label just a wee bit too seriously. Don&#039;t over analyze the metaphor, sayeth Jen. Edupunk won&#039;t die if we stop talking about or over analyzing it, but it will die if we stop doing it.

@D&#039;arcy I like Super Happy Fun DIY Smiley People, but I don&#039;t think that would have fit on Jim&#039;s fingers in the now iconic photo. But would work on a t-shirt. Hmmm ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Scott Ain&#8217;t that the truth. A few people, and I may have been among them, were taking the edupunk label just a wee bit too seriously. Don&#8217;t over analyze the metaphor, sayeth Jen. Edupunk won&#8217;t die if we stop talking about or over analyzing it, but it will die if we stop doing it.</p>
<p>@D&#8217;arcy I like Super Happy Fun DIY Smiley People, but I don&#8217;t think that would have fit on Jim&#8217;s fingers in the now iconic photo. But would work on a t-shirt. Hmmm &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Leslie</title>
		<link>http://www.darcynorman.net/2008/06/18/my-final-post-on-edupunk/#comment-183645</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Leslie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 06:28:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.darcynorman.net/?p=1976#comment-183645</guid>
		<description>edupunk didn&#039;t die after the first week, that was just when we stopped laughing at all the serious analysis about it ;-) 

edupunk will never die unless you let it. rock on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>edupunk didn&#8217;t die after the first week, that was just when we stopped laughing at all the serious analysis about it <img src='http://www.darcynorman.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' />  </p>
<p>edupunk will never die unless you let it. rock on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JIm</title>
		<link>http://www.darcynorman.net/2008/06/18/my-final-post-on-edupunk/#comment-183643</link>
		<dc:creator>JIm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 04:46:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.darcynorman.net/?p=1976#comment-183643</guid>
		<description>Amen!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amen!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
