<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Switching from Spam Karma 2 to Akismet</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.darcynorman.net/2008/02/17/switching-from-spam-karma-2-to-akismet/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.darcynorman.net/2008/02/17/switching-from-spam-karma-2-to-akismet/</link>
	<description>apparently much happier in person</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 05:03:04 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Gavin Ingham</title>
		<link>http://www.darcynorman.net/2008/02/17/switching-from-spam-karma-2-to-akismet/#comment-192852</link>
		<dc:creator>Gavin Ingham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 09:19:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.darcynorman.net/2008/02/17/switching-from-spam-karma-2-to-akismet/#comment-192852</guid>
		<description>Firstly, great blog… so much of interest and use on it.

And secondly, on to Askimet!! Until about 3 months or so ago Askimet span worked fine for me stopping 90%+ of spam and with what seemed high accuracy. Then over night everything changed. Askimet stopped catching spam and stopped being able to see what was and what was not spam.

I am sure that I do not get that much spam compared to some but comments on other sites such as read your spam comments are not really practical (I get several hundred a day and rising) and totally negate the point of having it in the first place.

Over the last day or two the stats were as follows…

Total comments &amp; spam 359.
Awaiting moderation 174 – Spam 170, legitimate 4.
Askimet spam 185 – Spam 168, legitimate 7.

This would imply that Askimet is guessing and not that well at that. I have emailed Askimet to ask for advice but would be interested if anyone else has experienced a rapid change in fortunes with Askimet, what caused it and what the solution is…</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Firstly, great blog… so much of interest and use on it.</p>
<p>And secondly, on to Askimet!! Until about 3 months or so ago Askimet span worked fine for me stopping 90%+ of spam and with what seemed high accuracy. Then over night everything changed. Askimet stopped catching spam and stopped being able to see what was and what was not spam.</p>
<p>I am sure that I do not get that much spam compared to some but comments on other sites such as read your spam comments are not really practical (I get several hundred a day and rising) and totally negate the point of having it in the first place.</p>
<p>Over the last day or two the stats were as follows…</p>
<p>Total comments &amp; spam 359.<br />
Awaiting moderation 174 – Spam 170, legitimate 4.<br />
Askimet spam 185 – Spam 168, legitimate 7.</p>
<p>This would imply that Askimet is guessing and not that well at that. I have emailed Askimet to ask for advice but would be interested if anyone else has experienced a rapid change in fortunes with Askimet, what caused it and what the solution is…</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Esrati</title>
		<link>http://www.darcynorman.net/2008/02/17/switching-from-spam-karma-2-to-akismet/#comment-184827</link>
		<dc:creator>David Esrati</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 14:25:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.darcynorman.net/2008/02/17/switching-from-spam-karma-2-to-akismet/#comment-184827</guid>
		<description>While Dr. Dave said he was giving up SK- he gave it up to the community- to see what others do with it.
http://unknowngenius.com/blog/archives/2008/07/14/spam-karma-is-gpl/
SK still works just fine.
I totally agree with Dave that Akismet doesn&#039;t seem to make sense: &quot;As for WP coming bundled with its own anti-spam plugin, I could also go on for hours on that. The fact that a community-based open-source project is used to distribute a commercially licensed piece of software doesn’t make me particularly happy.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While Dr. Dave said he was giving up SK- he gave it up to the community- to see what others do with it.<br />
<a href="http://unknowngenius.com/blog/archives/2008/07/14/spam-karma-is-gpl/" rel="nofollow">http://unknowngenius.com/blog/archives/2008/07/14/spam-karma-is-gpl/</a><br />
SK still works just fine.<br />
I totally agree with Dave that Akismet doesn&#8217;t seem to make sense: &#8220;As for WP coming bundled with its own anti-spam plugin, I could also go on for hours on that. The fact that a community-based open-source project is used to distribute a commercially licensed piece of software doesn’t make me particularly happy.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Holly</title>
		<link>http://www.darcynorman.net/2008/02/17/switching-from-spam-karma-2-to-akismet/#comment-184826</link>
		<dc:creator>Holly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 13:19:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.darcynorman.net/2008/02/17/switching-from-spam-karma-2-to-akismet/#comment-184826</guid>
		<description>Today&#039;s the day.  No more SK2.  7/16/2008 SK2 RIP</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today&#8217;s the day.  No more SK2.  7/16/2008 SK2 RIP</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris L</title>
		<link>http://www.darcynorman.net/2008/02/17/switching-from-spam-karma-2-to-akismet/#comment-179618</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris L</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 16:00:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.darcynorman.net/2008/02/17/switching-from-spam-karma-2-to-akismet/#comment-179618</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know, guess I have good mojo. The combination seems to be relatively common. I think there is some kind of plugin to feed Spam Karma caught spam to Akismet, which makes me suspect that in the ordinary run of things that doesn&#039;t happen at all. But your mileage may vary.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know, guess I have good mojo. The combination seems to be relatively common. I think there is some kind of plugin to feed Spam Karma caught spam to Akismet, which makes me suspect that in the ordinary run of things that doesn&#8217;t happen at all. But your mileage may vary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dnorman</title>
		<link>http://www.darcynorman.net/2008/02/17/switching-from-spam-karma-2-to-akismet/#comment-179616</link>
		<dc:creator>dnorman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 04:07:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.darcynorman.net/2008/02/17/switching-from-spam-karma-2-to-akismet/#comment-179616</guid>
		<description>@chris: the last time I tried mixing Akismet with anything else, the non-akismet spamcop wound up feeding false negatives back to Akismet and I got blacklisted or something. I talked with Matt and it got cleared up, but it&#039;s left me a bit leery about mixing the dark arts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@chris: the last time I tried mixing Akismet with anything else, the non-akismet spamcop wound up feeding false negatives back to Akismet and I got blacklisted or something. I talked with Matt and it got cleared up, but it&#8217;s left me a bit leery about mixing the dark arts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris L</title>
		<link>http://www.darcynorman.net/2008/02/17/switching-from-spam-karma-2-to-akismet/#comment-179613</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris L</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 00:30:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.darcynorman.net/2008/02/17/switching-from-spam-karma-2-to-akismet/#comment-179613</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m only about 175,000 spams blocked, but I am using Spam Karma *and* Akismet with fair success. very few false positives... though I am still surprised at some of the things it puts in moderation that are so obviously spam!

Google&#039;s shown very little interest in trying to deal with the problem. Philosophically,  I can understand why, even if I don&#039;t agree with it. The one thing they DID do (the nofollow tag) is a disaster, killing off as much good credit as bad...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m only about 175,000 spams blocked, but I am using Spam Karma *and* Akismet with fair success. very few false positives&#8230; though I am still surprised at some of the things it puts in moderation that are so obviously spam!</p>
<p>Google&#8217;s shown very little interest in trying to deal with the problem. Philosophically,  I can understand why, even if I don&#8217;t agree with it. The one thing they DID do (the nofollow tag) is a disaster, killing off as much good credit as bad&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dnorman</title>
		<link>http://www.darcynorman.net/2008/02/17/switching-from-spam-karma-2-to-akismet/#comment-179608</link>
		<dc:creator>dnorman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 05:46:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.darcynorman.net/2008/02/17/switching-from-spam-karma-2-to-akismet/#comment-179608</guid>
		<description>@david: you&#039;re 3 for 3 under Akismet. That last one was flagged as spam as well. I&#039;m going to see if there&#039;s a way to let them know about that asap.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@david: you&#8217;re 3 for 3 under Akismet. That last one was flagged as spam as well. I&#8217;m going to see if there&#8217;s a way to let them know about that asap.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Esrati</title>
		<link>http://www.darcynorman.net/2008/02/17/switching-from-spam-karma-2-to-akismet/#comment-179607</link>
		<dc:creator>David Esrati</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 04:46:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.darcynorman.net/2008/02/17/switching-from-spam-karma-2-to-akismet/#comment-179607</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t spam other blogs- but, I have been following up every post about me in my election.
I didn&#039;t have very good luck with akismet- same sort of behavior.
Google could easily solve this problem- by shutting scraper sites and every other site on the host machine out. It would end spam comments in about a day. Please do talk to auttomatic- and ask them to make peace with Dr. Dave and try his route- much more effective.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t spam other blogs- but, I have been following up every post about me in my election.<br />
I didn&#8217;t have very good luck with akismet- same sort of behavior.<br />
Google could easily solve this problem- by shutting scraper sites and every other site on the host machine out. It would end spam comments in about a day. Please do talk to auttomatic- and ask them to make peace with Dr. Dave and try his route- much more effective.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dnorman</title>
		<link>http://www.darcynorman.net/2008/02/17/switching-from-spam-karma-2-to-akismet/#comment-179605</link>
		<dc:creator>dnorman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 04:34:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.darcynorman.net/2008/02/17/switching-from-spam-karma-2-to-akismet/#comment-179605</guid>
		<description>@david: almost forgot. the &quot;you are being watched&quot; thing is from the Voyeur plugin for wordpress. It adds yet another set of stats to obsess over, this time tracking people who have commented and when they&#039;ve come back to visit. Kind of interesting (actually, very interesting) but a little creepy. I&#039;m trying to hit the &quot;disable&quot; button, but haven&#039;t been able to pull the trigger yet...

Info on Blog Voyeur: http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/blog-voyeur/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@david: almost forgot. the &#8220;you are being watched&#8221; thing is from the Voyeur plugin for wordpress. It adds yet another set of stats to obsess over, this time tracking people who have commented and when they&#8217;ve come back to visit. Kind of interesting (actually, very interesting) but a little creepy. I&#8217;m trying to hit the &#8220;disable&#8221; button, but haven&#8217;t been able to pull the trigger yet&#8230;</p>
<p>Info on Blog Voyeur: <a href="http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/blog-voyeur/" rel="nofollow">http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/blog-voyeur/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dnorman</title>
		<link>http://www.darcynorman.net/2008/02/17/switching-from-spam-karma-2-to-akismet/#comment-179604</link>
		<dc:creator>dnorman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 04:29:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.darcynorman.net/2008/02/17/switching-from-spam-karma-2-to-akismet/#comment-179604</guid>
		<description>@david: it flagged you as spam again. dangit! wtf, akismet? or are you busy spamming other blogs :-) At this rate, I don&#039;t trust Akismet, which is far worse than having to moderate a few comments each day. I&#039;ll give it a week to smarten up, then it&#039;s back to SK2. If only I had the opportunity to talk with the Automattic team in person. Oh, wait. They&#039;ll be at Northern Voice. I&#039;ll be sure to raise this... :-)

@alan: yeah. fracking spammers. Google needs a big fat &quot;report a url as spam&quot; that lets people submit a suspected spam site to be checked out. Can&#039;t be automatic - that would cause narc wars - but it could put all click-payments to be put into an escrow-like account so the suspected spammers don&#039;t see a cent until a Google rep has greenlighted their url(s). easy fix. it would just take money. if only Google had access to some of that...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@david: it flagged you as spam again. dangit! wtf, akismet? or are you busy spamming other blogs <img src='http://www.darcynorman.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />  At this rate, I don&#8217;t trust Akismet, which is far worse than having to moderate a few comments each day. I&#8217;ll give it a week to smarten up, then it&#8217;s back to SK2. If only I had the opportunity to talk with the Automattic team in person. Oh, wait. They&#8217;ll be at Northern Voice. I&#8217;ll be sure to raise this&#8230; <img src='http://www.darcynorman.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>@alan: yeah. fracking spammers. Google needs a big fat &#8220;report a url as spam&#8221; that lets people submit a suspected spam site to be checked out. Can&#8217;t be automatic &#8211; that would cause narc wars &#8211; but it could put all click-payments to be put into an escrow-like account so the suspected spammers don&#8217;t see a cent until a Google rep has greenlighted their url(s). easy fix. it would just take money. if only Google had access to some of that&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
