<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Recipe for building a Drupal-powered blogging community website</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.darcynorman.net/2007/11/29/recipe-for-building-a-drupal-powered-blogging-community-website/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.darcynorman.net/2007/11/29/recipe-for-building-a-drupal-powered-blogging-community-website/</link>
	<description>just a lowly edtech geek, mumble mumble university of calgary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 17:18:11 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: dnorman</title>
		<link>http://www.darcynorman.net/2007/11/29/recipe-for-building-a-drupal-powered-blogging-community-website/#comment-192266</link>
		<dc:creator>dnorman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 14:11:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.darcynorman.net/2007/11/29/recipe-for-building-a-drupal-powered-blogging-community-website/#comment-192266</guid>
		<description>comments closed due to excessive spam on this post. thanks, spamass roaches.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>comments closed due to excessive spam on this post. thanks, spamass roaches.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Art</title>
		<link>http://www.darcynorman.net/2007/11/29/recipe-for-building-a-drupal-powered-blogging-community-website/#comment-192195</link>
		<dc:creator>Art</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 01:16:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.darcynorman.net/2007/11/29/recipe-for-building-a-drupal-powered-blogging-community-website/#comment-192195</guid>
		<description>We had serious debates (that actually took months!) should be go with Wordpress or Drupal for our child-related website. Finally, it ended up being Drupal\&#039;s Forum module that tipped the scales for us. Drupal\&#039;s Forum comes right out of the box, it is a part of Drupal\&#039;s core. No need to integrate 2-nd party forum software with your CMS. It does not have all the bells and whistles of mainstream forum scripts, but it does the job for us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We had serious debates (that actually took months!) should be go with Wordpress or Drupal for our child-related website. Finally, it ended up being Drupal\&#8217;s Forum module that tipped the scales for us. Drupal\&#8217;s Forum comes right out of the box, it is a part of Drupal\&#8217;s core. No need to integrate 2-nd party forum software with your CMS. It does not have all the bells and whistles of mainstream forum scripts, but it does the job for us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jim mccann</title>
		<link>http://www.darcynorman.net/2007/11/29/recipe-for-building-a-drupal-powered-blogging-community-website/#comment-185343</link>
		<dc:creator>jim mccann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 19:39:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.darcynorman.net/2007/11/29/recipe-for-building-a-drupal-powered-blogging-community-website/#comment-185343</guid>
		<description>I was thinking of building a Community site using Joomla, then I considered Wordpress and swung back towards Joomla.

After reading your article, I think I have swayed towrds Drupal.

Thanks for the article</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was thinking of building a Community site using Joomla, then I considered Wordpress and swung back towards Joomla.</p>
<p>After reading your article, I think I have swayed towrds Drupal.</p>
<p>Thanks for the article</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean Nalewanyj</title>
		<link>http://www.darcynorman.net/2007/11/29/recipe-for-building-a-drupal-powered-blogging-community-website/#comment-183919</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean Nalewanyj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 08:03:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.darcynorman.net/2007/11/29/recipe-for-building-a-drupal-powered-blogging-community-website/#comment-183919</guid>
		<description>Now what I&#039;m really trying to figure out is if there is something similar that can be done in Wordpress using some plugins and changing the settings using the &#039;subtle&#039; theme series. because I know it supports multi-author blogs very well. I say this because while Drupal is a great CMS, its capabilities are more suited for high-end, corporate level users, not lame little bloggers like me :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now what I&#8217;m really trying to figure out is if there is something similar that can be done in Wordpress using some plugins and changing the settings using the &#8217;subtle&#8217; theme series. because I know it supports multi-author blogs very well. I say this because while Drupal is a great CMS, its capabilities are more suited for high-end, corporate level users, not lame little bloggers like me <img src='http://www.darcynorman.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dnorman</title>
		<link>http://www.darcynorman.net/2007/11/29/recipe-for-building-a-drupal-powered-blogging-community-website/#comment-158846</link>
		<dc:creator>dnorman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2007 16:29:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.darcynorman.net/2007/11/29/recipe-for-building-a-drupal-powered-blogging-community-website/#comment-158846</guid>
		<description>Jeff, CCK completely rocks, and I use it for 99% of the sites I build in Drupal, but for a simple community blogging site, it&#039;s a bit overkill. It&#039;d just add complexity (where do I put the text? in the &quot;body&quot; field? or these other ones?) so it&#039;s better to err on the side of simplicity in a case like this. For a site where structured content types can be effectively used (like &lt;a href=&quot;http://tlc.ucalgary.ca&quot;&gt;my department&#039;s site&lt;/a&gt;) CCK can&#039;t be beat.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeff, CCK completely rocks, and I use it for 99% of the sites I build in Drupal, but for a simple community blogging site, it&#8217;s a bit overkill. It&#8217;d just add complexity (where do I put the text? in the &#8220;body&#8221; field? or these other ones?) so it&#8217;s better to err on the side of simplicity in a case like this. For a site where structured content types can be effectively used (like <a href="http://tlc.ucalgary.ca">my department&#8217;s site</a>) CCK can&#8217;t be beat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Minard</title>
		<link>http://www.darcynorman.net/2007/11/29/recipe-for-building-a-drupal-powered-blogging-community-website/#comment-158772</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Minard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2007 12:34:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.darcynorman.net/2007/11/29/recipe-for-building-a-drupal-powered-blogging-community-website/#comment-158772</guid>
		<description>I, too, am using Drupal now for my next &quot;community&quot; website. I&#039;ll be using most of those modules too, as it turns out. (Got to you site searching to fix some random wp bug, heh)

I think one of the key benefits to Drupal is that there is an amazingly enormous amount of functionality behind it without ever actually needing to write a single line of code. That, still, blows me away. 

One of the most incredibly powerful tools you&#039;ve left out of this post is CCK. I consider CCK, along with Views, to be absolutely indispensable to a drupal site. To be quite honest, I am hoping that someday CCK and Views are core modules for the actual creation of content types and site pages, but that&#039;s a long ways off (like v7/8 :D).

As a long time WP user, it&#039;s been pretty staggering working with Drupal so far. One thing, however, that has been a NIGHTMARE compared to working in WP is that themeing in Drupal is pretty much the most difficult time I&#039;ve ever had themeing anything. Sheesh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I, too, am using Drupal now for my next &#8220;community&#8221; website. I&#8217;ll be using most of those modules too, as it turns out. (Got to you site searching to fix some random wp bug, heh)</p>
<p>I think one of the key benefits to Drupal is that there is an amazingly enormous amount of functionality behind it without ever actually needing to write a single line of code. That, still, blows me away. </p>
<p>One of the most incredibly powerful tools you&#8217;ve left out of this post is CCK. I consider CCK, along with Views, to be absolutely indispensable to a drupal site. To be quite honest, I am hoping that someday CCK and Views are core modules for the actual creation of content types and site pages, but that&#8217;s a long ways off (like v7/8 <img src='http://www.darcynorman.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> ).</p>
<p>As a long time WP user, it&#8217;s been pretty staggering working with Drupal so far. One thing, however, that has been a NIGHTMARE compared to working in WP is that themeing in Drupal is pretty much the most difficult time I&#8217;ve ever had themeing anything. Sheesh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will Taylor</title>
		<link>http://www.darcynorman.net/2007/11/29/recipe-for-building-a-drupal-powered-blogging-community-website/#comment-146656</link>
		<dc:creator>Will Taylor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 21:53:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.darcynorman.net/2007/11/29/recipe-for-building-a-drupal-powered-blogging-community-website/#comment-146656</guid>
		<description>D&#039;Arcy,

This post came at a most excellent time for me, as I&#039;m preparing to move my site into launch.  As I&#039;m getting this Ready to Go, for our winter quarter, the question that has come up most clearly, is one of simplicity (the KISS factor) v/s built-in functionality (the candybox factor when reviewing the extensive Drupal modules pages, and all their amazing possibilities).

And in reference to Gardner Campbell&#039;s Theme Parks and Sandboxes article which you recently linked (thanks, what a great read), it occurs to me that there is something between a Sandbox and a Theme Park - &amp; that&#039;s a big box of Legos (and when it comes to a platform like Drupal, it&#039;s a really Big Box).

So I&#039;m deliberating ...  Is it best to leave a site like this a Sandbox, or to develop it into a box of Legos?
e.g. - re sharing weblinks among users - what are the advantages, one way or the other, from the educational perspective - of creating formal respositories of weblinks which users can contribute to and build up over time - v/s merely permitting users to share a link or two here or there in Blog posts?  To creating Bibliography pages where users can assemble Useful References, to merely permitting conversations such as this to be shared in Blog postings? One might argue that by creating things such as Links Repositories and assembled Bibliographies, something of durable value is created, which future users will be able to access, and they will not need to &quot;re-invent the wheel&quot; as such.  But wait a minute - what we&#039;ve really done, perhaps, is permitted the early users to create a Theme Park - albeit out of Legos - for the &quot;benefit&quot; of future users, and redirected the attention of future users from the Sandbox functions of the site - which is where the real learning occurs.

I&#039;ve decided to go Simple, so I&#039;m constructing another site just for myself with all the features built in (just &#039;cause I can&#039;t keep my hands off of all the toys ...).

I&#039;d love to hear others&#039; thoughts &amp; experiences.

Will Taylor
National College of Natural Medicine
Portland, Oregon</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>D&#8217;Arcy,</p>
<p>This post came at a most excellent time for me, as I&#8217;m preparing to move my site into launch.  As I&#8217;m getting this Ready to Go, for our winter quarter, the question that has come up most clearly, is one of simplicity (the KISS factor) v/s built-in functionality (the candybox factor when reviewing the extensive Drupal modules pages, and all their amazing possibilities).</p>
<p>And in reference to Gardner Campbell&#8217;s Theme Parks and Sandboxes article which you recently linked (thanks, what a great read), it occurs to me that there is something between a Sandbox and a Theme Park &#8211; &amp; that&#8217;s a big box of Legos (and when it comes to a platform like Drupal, it&#8217;s a really Big Box).</p>
<p>So I&#8217;m deliberating &#8230;  Is it best to leave a site like this a Sandbox, or to develop it into a box of Legos?<br />
e.g. &#8211; re sharing weblinks among users &#8211; what are the advantages, one way or the other, from the educational perspective &#8211; of creating formal respositories of weblinks which users can contribute to and build up over time &#8211; v/s merely permitting users to share a link or two here or there in Blog posts?  To creating Bibliography pages where users can assemble Useful References, to merely permitting conversations such as this to be shared in Blog postings? One might argue that by creating things such as Links Repositories and assembled Bibliographies, something of durable value is created, which future users will be able to access, and they will not need to &#8220;re-invent the wheel&#8221; as such.  But wait a minute &#8211; what we&#8217;ve really done, perhaps, is permitted the early users to create a Theme Park &#8211; albeit out of Legos &#8211; for the &#8220;benefit&#8221; of future users, and redirected the attention of future users from the Sandbox functions of the site &#8211; which is where the real learning occurs.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve decided to go Simple, so I&#8217;m constructing another site just for myself with all the features built in (just &#8217;cause I can&#8217;t keep my hands off of all the toys &#8230;).</p>
<p>I&#8217;d love to hear others&#8217; thoughts &amp; experiences.</p>
<p>Will Taylor<br />
National College of Natural Medicine<br />
Portland, Oregon</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will Taylor</title>
		<link>http://www.darcynorman.net/2007/11/29/recipe-for-building-a-drupal-powered-blogging-community-website/#comment-145949</link>
		<dc:creator>Will Taylor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2007 21:45:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.darcynorman.net/2007/11/29/recipe-for-building-a-drupal-powered-blogging-community-website/#comment-145949</guid>
		<description>Thanks D&#039;Arcy!

I&#039;ve been working on just this very thing, presently in prelaunch for our community, &amp; have recently upgraded it to Drupal 5.3.
We&#039;re using Moodle as an LMS, but are in the process of converting from a relatively fragmented course-by-course curriculum to a more integrated, problem-based curriculum - so are wanting to augment the excellent course-support provided in the Moodle platform, with a platform that bores across the curriculum - permitting journaling/blogging, portfolio development, access to multimedia learning objects, permits learner group development &amp; support, &amp;c.

I might add to your list, to meet the needs of a learning community such as ours, a good aggregator that can create site-wide-accessible as well as organic-group restricted aggregated feed pages.  I&#039;m using SimpleFeed, as the built-in Aggregator module seems to break my installation.  The Bibliography module also looks promising for our needs.  (the Drupal module archives is a bit of a candy box ...)

Thanks for the reference to Anarchy Media Player!  I&#039;ll let you know how this works for us.

Am still waiting for a simple solution to single sign-on for a Drupal/Moodle installation, this would be great to provide a more seamless experience to the user.

Will Taylor
National College of Natural Medicine
Portland, Oregon</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks D&#8217;Arcy!</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been working on just this very thing, presently in prelaunch for our community, &amp; have recently upgraded it to Drupal 5.3.<br />
We&#8217;re using Moodle as an LMS, but are in the process of converting from a relatively fragmented course-by-course curriculum to a more integrated, problem-based curriculum &#8211; so are wanting to augment the excellent course-support provided in the Moodle platform, with a platform that bores across the curriculum &#8211; permitting journaling/blogging, portfolio development, access to multimedia learning objects, permits learner group development &amp; support, &amp;c.</p>
<p>I might add to your list, to meet the needs of a learning community such as ours, a good aggregator that can create site-wide-accessible as well as organic-group restricted aggregated feed pages.  I&#8217;m using SimpleFeed, as the built-in Aggregator module seems to break my installation.  The Bibliography module also looks promising for our needs.  (the Drupal module archives is a bit of a candy box &#8230;)</p>
<p>Thanks for the reference to Anarchy Media Player!  I&#8217;ll let you know how this works for us.</p>
<p>Am still waiting for a simple solution to single sign-on for a Drupal/Moodle installation, this would be great to provide a more seamless experience to the user.</p>
<p>Will Taylor<br />
National College of Natural Medicine<br />
Portland, Oregon</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dnorman</title>
		<link>http://www.darcynorman.net/2007/11/29/recipe-for-building-a-drupal-powered-blogging-community-website/#comment-145057</link>
		<dc:creator>dnorman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 01:46:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.darcynorman.net/2007/11/29/recipe-for-building-a-drupal-powered-blogging-community-website/#comment-145057</guid>
		<description>bon appetite!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>bon appetite!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
