<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Interestingness</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.darcynorman.net/2006/03/10/interestingness/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.darcynorman.net/2006/03/10/interestingness/</link>
	<description>ce n'est pas la connaissance.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 14:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: gillian</title>
		<link>http://www.darcynorman.net/2006/03/10/interestingness/#comment-81557</link>
		<dc:creator>gillian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-81557</guid>
		<description>Well, you have increased its "interestingness" by posting the photo here ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, you have increased its &#8220;interestingness&#8221; by posting the photo here <img src='http://www.darcynorman.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: D'Arcy</title>
		<link>http://www.darcynorman.net/2006/03/10/interestingness/#comment-81558</link>
		<dc:creator>D'Arcy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-81558</guid>
		<description>From what I've gathered, it's some sort of magic algorithm that is more about how a photo stands out from the rest of your photos, rather than everyone else's. Say you post 100 photos, and they average 10 views, 0 faves, and 1 comment. You then post a photo that gets 1000 views, or 10 faves, or 100 comments (or some combinations thereof) - the interestingness says "hey! this photo is interesting (compared to what this person usually posts)"  So it's possible for someone to grab #1 interestingness with a photo that gets viewed much less that the "most viewed" photo of the day.

Regardless, it was just cool to see a photo bubble up that high. It's up to 25 now. Not bad for a throwaway photo I took while riding the bus to kill time while playing with the macro setting :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From what I&#8217;ve gathered, it&#8217;s some sort of magic algorithm that is more about how a photo stands out from the rest of your photos, rather than everyone else&#8217;s. Say you post 100 photos, and they average 10 views, 0 faves, and 1 comment. You then post a photo that gets 1000 views, or 10 faves, or 100 comments (or some combinations thereof) - the interestingness says &#8220;hey! this photo is interesting (compared to what this person usually posts)&#8221;  So it&#8217;s possible for someone to grab #1 interestingness with a photo that gets viewed much less that the &#8220;most viewed&#8221; photo of the day.</p>
<p>Regardless, it was just cool to see a photo bubble up that high. It&#8217;s up to 25 now. Not bad for a throwaway photo I took while riding the bus to kill time while playing with the macro setting <img src='http://www.darcynorman.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gillian</title>
		<link>http://www.darcynorman.net/2006/03/10/interestingness/#comment-81559</link>
		<dc:creator>gillian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-81559</guid>
		<description>I don't really get how that "Interestingness" works. One of my photos got up to at least #10 for its day (that I noticed), but the number keeps changing and it's back down again to #20-something. I guess it's just another way to get us users fetishizing our stats, but it seems kind of arbitrary.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t really get how that &#8220;Interestingness&#8221; works. One of my photos got up to at least #10 for its day (that I noticed), but the number keeps changing and it&#8217;s back down again to #20-something. I guess it&#8217;s just another way to get us users fetishizing our stats, but it seems kind of arbitrary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
