<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dashboard Widgets can be CPU-Aggressive</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.darcynorman.net/2005/05/05/dashboard-widgets-can-be-cpu-aggressive/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.darcynorman.net/2005/05/05/dashboard-widgets-can-be-cpu-aggressive/</link>
	<description>just a lowly edtech geek, mumble mumble university of calgary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 22:04:56 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Doug Davis</title>
		<link>http://www.darcynorman.net/2005/05/05/dashboard-widgets-can-be-cpu-aggressive/#comment-79845</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug Davis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-79845</guid>
		<description>I just found this out after an upgrade .. what a collossal waste of cpu  .. I guess they count the microseconds in a for loop or something</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just found this out after an upgrade .. what a collossal waste of cpu  .. I guess they count the microseconds in a for loop or something</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nikos</title>
		<link>http://www.darcynorman.net/2005/05/05/dashboard-widgets-can-be-cpu-aggressive/#comment-79846</link>
		<dc:creator>Nikos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-79846</guid>
		<description>I was shocked to notice that as well - thats why i switched to another clock widget which spends only.. 15% of the cpu instead of 20 ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was shocked to notice that as well &#8211; thats why i switched to another clock widget which spends only.. 15% of the cpu instead of 20 <img src='http://www.darcynorman.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Salsbury</title>
		<link>http://www.darcynorman.net/2005/05/05/dashboard-widgets-can-be-cpu-aggressive/#comment-79847</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Salsbury</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-79847</guid>
		<description>The situation gets worse the longer World Clock is left up and running.  I left a single instance going for about 2 weeks and found it had eaten 46% of the CPU.  I&#039;m currently conducting a more scientific experiment, taking performance snapshots every hour using a cron task and the &quot;ps&quot; command to snapshot all the active widgets.  What I&#039;m finding is World Clock eats an additional 1% of CPU each hour it&#039;s active and more RAM as well.  I&#039;m trying to leave the Dashboard up and running on the system as long as possible, in the hope of accumulating enough performance data to convince Apple that they&#039;ve got a real problem in that widget since people really like to use it they generally can&#039;t afford to lose 46% of their CPU... See the latest data at http://mikesalsbury.com/mambo/content/view/238/1/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The situation gets worse the longer World Clock is left up and running.  I left a single instance going for about 2 weeks and found it had eaten 46% of the CPU.  I&#8217;m currently conducting a more scientific experiment, taking performance snapshots every hour using a cron task and the &#8220;ps&#8221; command to snapshot all the active widgets.  What I&#8217;m finding is World Clock eats an additional 1% of CPU each hour it&#8217;s active and more RAM as well.  I&#8217;m trying to leave the Dashboard up and running on the system as long as possible, in the hope of accumulating enough performance data to convince Apple that they&#8217;ve got a real problem in that widget since people really like to use it they generally can&#8217;t afford to lose 46% of their CPU&#8230; See the latest data at <a href="http://mikesalsbury.com/mambo/content/view/238/1/" rel="nofollow">http://mikesalsbury.com/mambo/content/view/238/1/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
