This is a brief article (Library Journal - Googlizers vs. Resistors) with discusson of ethnoclassification (bags-of-keywords) vs. controlled vocabularies to describe resources.

Stephen Downes pointed out the article, with the insightful comment:

In a world where tomorrow is different from yesterday, controlled vocabularies (are) not only inefficient, they’re dangerous. In a controlled vocabulary, not only can you not classify ‘podcasting’, you cannot even register its impact. Some librarians are getting this message. Others are not. Oh, and judging the effectiveness of a non-taxonomy based search by what Google can (only) do today? Mistake.

I’m seriously thinking of biting the bullet and finishing my MSc, with a thesis on ethnoclassification vs. controlled vocabularies…

One Response to “Library Journal - Googlizers vs. Resistors”
  1. “ethnoclassification vs. controlled vocabularies” did you finish this- im doing something similar and would like to connect.

Leave a Reply

Readers who viewed this page, also viewed:

  • N/A
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 Canada License.